Monday, January 19, 2009

The anti-entry: slacks

I loath the word "slacks." It has a slimy sounding beginning with an "ack" of an icky ending.  Slacks! The word almost smacks you in the face with its somehow simultaneously harsh slipperiness. The American Heritage College dictionary defines slacks as, "Casual trousers that are not part of a suit." I even dislike its definition, since the word "trousers" is another word I particularly dislike. Why can people not use the word pants? Perhaps I am being a bit harsh on these words. I do appreciate the attempts to give more description than a simple "he is wearing pants." Some might even think that using the word pants is lacking in description. There is just something about how the word sounds and the connotation it calls to mind that makes it hard for me not to cringe whenever someone tells me about their new slacks. 

2 comments:

  1. This isn't really applicable in America, but in England, when you say "pants", you are refering to underwear ("Underpants")and not slacks. Therefore, instead of saying "pants", they say that you are wearing trousers. Be sure to remember this when going to England so you don't accidentally embarrass one of your friends by saying "Hey! Nice Pants!" or "I like your pants!". That would make the situation really uncomfortable. Just so you know. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sometimes it means "not shorts," and then it seems to be a purely relative term. But I can't seem to picture denim slacks, and I should be able to if the word is purely relative. Pretty weird...

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.